Peter Brooks wrote:
>
>
> On 11/20/06, *Ciemon Dunville* <ciemon@???
> <mailto:ciemon@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> ..according to an article on The Register.
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/11/20/microsoft_claims_linux_code/
>
> --
> Please post to: Hampshire@???
> <mailto:Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk>
> Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
> LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Surprise surprise!
>
> We all knew it was one of the worst deals of recent times, Anyone up for
> boycotting Novell & SuSE Completly for this action?
> Also any code anyone from SuSE/Novell submits as a patch should be
> instantly declined unless it's licensed in the free spirit. None of this
> Microsoft owns Linux rubbish.
Suse has sat at No 2 in the distrowatch list for some time now.
I happened to be looking at the distrowatch 7 day refresh numbers
yesterday and was surprised to see that over the short term, suse was
No3!
No 2 was a ubuntu media friendly derivative 'Mint'
--
alan cocks
Linux registered user #360648
