Re: [Hampshire] LVM query.

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Vic
Date:  
To: hampshire
Subject: Re: [Hampshire] LVM query.
> Please could someone explain this?

> Disk /dev/dm-0 doesn't contain a valid partition table


The dm devices appear to be disks, but they aren't - they're LVM
creations. As such, they're not going to hold a partition table in the
same way as a real disk.

It's arguably a bug that "fdisk -l" even looks - but I'm not sure whether
that's a bug in fdisk or in LVM...

> I have Googled and it was said "... doesn't contain a valid partition
> table" was normal and is nothing to worry about!


In this context, I wouldn't worry.

> The reason I ask is
> that when I do a `yum update` all goes well unless there is a kernel
> update. The system will not boot from the new kernel and I have to
> revert to the original (2.6.18-1.2257.fc5).


What symptoms do you see?

Failing to find disks when booting a new kernel usually means you need to
run mkinitrd - but I'd expect a distro kernel package to come bundled with
something suitable...

Vic.