On Tuesday 07 October 2008 23:17:12 Steve Kemp wrote: > I'm actually more curious about the relative age spread amongst the
> LUG members.
Well, assuming that 14 is now the youngest, we have 14 to 79 or 80. Which are
you, John? Or am I way off beam, and you too are coy about your age? Or is
there now someone older than John Lewis? We have quite a few members in
their sixties. Any claims for seventies? Or eighties?
