Re: [Hampshire] Bad GPG signatures

Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
M-\the complete thread tree sorted by date
M.MChris Smith at <-
M\MHugo Mills at ->
Author: Chris Smith
Date:  
To: adam.trickett, Hampshire LUG Discussion List
Subject: Re: [Hampshire] Bad GPG signatures

Reply to this message
gpg: failed to create temporary file '/var/lib/lurker/.#lk0x5759e100.hantslug.org.uk.11451': Permission denied
gpg: keyblock resource '/var/lib/lurker/pubring.gpg': Permission denied
gpg: Signature made Tue Jan 6 20:04:05 2009 GMT
gpg: using DSA key 11BEF6408586B4B2
gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
Dr Adam Trickett wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 Jan 2009, Hugo Mills wrote:
>>    Test message.

>
> Looks good.

And this one is bad for me. (Ubuntu Intrepid, gpg 1.4.9)

Chris
--
Chris Smith <cjs94@???>


This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
Hampshire LUG
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-Re: [Hampshire] Bad GPG signaturesRe: [Hampshire] Bad GPG signatures->
Hampshire LUG Mailing List Archive administrated by WebmasterLurker (version 2.3)