Re: [Hampshire] OT:What? 6 years to analogue ra dio off

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Andy Random
Date:  
To: Hampshire LUG Discussion List
Subject: Re: [Hampshire] OT:What? 6 years to analogue ra dio off

On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, Vic wrote:

> The unfotunate bit of this whole mess is not the extra cost - ?6 a year
> really isn't all that bad - it's that it represents a government bung to a
> private industry who will (allegedly) buy loads of kit with that money -
> then rent it back to the people who paid for it. If the new lines were
> publicly owned, I wouldn't worry.


"publicly owned" ?!?

What are you Vic, some kind of communist?

:)

Andy