Re: [Hampshire] Dependency hell (Was: Re: Xorg is hungry tod…

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Keith Edmunds
Date:  
To: hampshire
Subject: Re: [Hampshire] Dependency hell (Was: Re: Xorg is hungry today...)
On Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:18:46 +0100, lug@??? said:

> As far as being rude, I think you are just after an argument so please
> just leave it.


Let me just check I understand. Anyone who disagrees with your view of Red
Hat upgrades or package management doesn't know what they are talking
about (haven't heard many people tell Hugo that), and anyone who questions
that statement is after an argument? Ah yes, got, thanks!

You may have the last word, sir, if you wish.