Re: [Hampshire] SMTP bounce

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Paul Stimpson
Date:  
To: Hampshire LUG Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Hampshire] SMTP bounce
Hi,

I was told it was the done thing to bounce but to not include the original message text.  That way spammers can't bombard your server using fake return addresses and have it dutifully send that spam to all the fake addresses. 

Cheers,
Paul. 

------Original Message------
From: Isaac Close
Sender: hampshire-bounces@???
To: Hampshire LUG Mailing List
ReplyTo: Hampshire LUG Mailing List
Subject: [Hampshire] SMTP bounce
Sent: 25 Nov 2009 13:55

Hello,

Personally, I always configure my email services to reject unknown recipients, don't really need to elaborate why.

Is it becoming common practice to sliently drop messages instead of bouncing them (because of forged return-paths) ?

thanks,

Isaac.




      

-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@???
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--------------------------------------------------------------


Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device