2010/1/26 Keith Edmunds <kae@???>:
> On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 23:22:10 -0000, martin@??? said:
>
>> Perhaps a better question is, why do you _think_ you need a 32 bit colour
>> image?
>
> Because the Sygic Moving Maps application (a SatNav application) on my
> Android phone crashes with Point Of Interest icons that are not 32bit.
> Yes, it's an app bug, but I figured it would be quicker to convert the
> icons I want to use to 32bit than to try to get the application fixed.
The Gimp certainly can't do it - it only works up to 12 bit images iirc
I am surprised your satnav even supports that bit depth...
I would look at the ImageMagic manpages very carefully as you are
right that searching for 32 wont get you far.
I have only ever use professional photo tools to work with 32 bit
images (and even 16 bit is more than I can reasonably print)
Anton
--
Anton Piatek
email: anton@???
blog/photos: http://www.strangeparty.com
pgp: [74B1FA37] (http://www.strangeparty.com/anton.asc)
fingerprint: 7401 96D3 E037 2F8F 5965 A358 4046 71FD 74B1 FA37
No trees were destroyed in the sending of this message, however, a
significant number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
%20on%20my%0A>%20>%20Android%20phone%20crashes%20with%20Point%20Of%20Interest%20icons%20that%20are%20not%2032bit.%0A>%20>%20Yes,%20it's%20an%20app%20bug,%20but%20I%20figured%20it%20would%20be%20quicker%20to%20convert%20the%0A>%20>%20icons%20I%20want%20to%20use%20to%2032bit%20than%20to%20try%20to%20get%20the%20application%20fixed.%0A>%20%0A>%20The%20Gimp%20certainly%20can't%20do%20it%20-%20it%20only%20works%20up%20to%2012%20bit%20images%20iirc%0A>%20I%20am%20surprised%20your%20satnav%20even%20supports%20that%20bit%20depth...%0A>%20%0A>%20I%20would%20look%20at%20the%20ImageMagic%20manpages%20very%20carefully%20as%20you%20are%0A>%20right%20that%20searching%20for%2032%20wont%20get%20you%20far.%0A>%20I%20have%20only%20ever%20use%20professional%20photo%20tools%20to%20work%20with%2032%20bit%0A>%20images%20(and%20even%2016%20bit%20is%20more%20than%20I%20can%20reasonably%20print)%0A>%20%0A>%20Anton%0A>%20%0A>%20%0A>%20%0A>%20No%20trees%20were%20destroyed%20in%20the%20sending%20of%20this%20message,%20however,%20a%0A>%20significant%20number%20of%20electrons%20were%20terribly%20inconvenienced.%0A>%20%0A>%20%0A>%20 "Reply to this message")