Re: [Hampshire] [OT]Datebase questions

On Wed, March 24, 2010 19:10, Daniel Pope wrote:
> Because if you mean running the database on the 64-bit machine and have it
> store
> tables on a remote filesystem, that's insane. It might work but it's much
> more
> likely to run as slow as hell and corrupt your database.
>

Actually, it's not only sane, but common practice.

For values of "remote" that mean proper NAS/SAN hardware one hop away via
a gige or better switches.