On 30 January 2012 17:39, James Courtier-Dutton <james.dutton@???> wrote:
> On 30 January 2012 17:21, James Bensley <jwbensley@???> wrote:
>
>> Are you referring to dynamic pools per chance?
>> http://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter/2001-March/008924.html
>>
>> This is an example of mapping 192.168.1.0/24 to another /24 but
>> dynamically, so 192.168.1.17 might not become 10.0.0.17, it might
>> become 10.0.0.33. Otherwise you need static pools or some sort of NAT
>> masquerading with 1:1 NAT.
>>
> I am looking for static 1:1 NAT,
> 192.168.1.1 must always be translated to 158.152.1.1
> 192.168.1.2 must always be translated to 158.152.1.2
> etc.
>
Ah in that case, you will have to add in 254 rules (or pairs of rules,
for return traffic) I believe.
--
James.
http://www.jamesbensley.co.cc/
--
Please post to: Hampshire@???
Web Interface:
https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL:
http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--------------------------------------------------------------
