Re: [Hampshire] Iceweasel

Top Page
Author: Andy Smith
Date:  
To: hampshire
Subject: Re: [Hampshire] Iceweasel

Reply to this message
gpg: failed to create temporary file '/var/lib/lurker/.#lk0x57213100.hantslug.org.uk.8330': Permission denied
gpg: keyblock resource '/var/lib/lurker/pubring.gpg': Permission denied
gpg: Signature made Mon Nov 13 14:41:46 2006 GMT
gpg: using DSA key 2099B64CBF15490B
gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 02:31:40PM +0000, James Ashburner wrote:
> >Am I being trolled here? Do you seriously not get why it's
> >essential to the whole ethos of FLOSS to have the right to fork a
> >project? What if this were XFree86 we were talking about and not
> >Firefox?
>
> But you are allowed to fork Firefox, so long as you don't try to claim
> it's still Firefox. XFree86 was forked but they didn't call the fork
> XFree86, it's X.org. Or am I missing something here?


What you're missing is that Jamie appears to be proposing that forks
aren't allowed if they are "impolite". "impolite" forks are what
"free software zealots" do, apparently.

Andy