Re: [Hampshire] No more non-GPL Linux kernel modules?

Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
Mthe complete thread tree sorted by date
MJohn Hunt at <-
MJohn Hunt at ->

Reply to this message
Author: Jamie Webb
Date:  
To: hampshire
Subject: Re: [Hampshire] No more non-GPL Linux kernel modules?
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 11:22:22AM +0000, John Hunt wrote:
> Can't we just have two different kernels, a GPL one and a non GPL one?
> Surely that makes sense.

Which non-GPL one would you like? Darwin? OpenSolaris? WinNT :-)?

Seriously, the whole point of the GPL is that once software is GPLed
it stays that way. Linux can never be 'un-GPLed'.

/J


This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
Hampshire LUG
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-Re: [Hampshire] No more non-GPL Linux kernel modules?Re: [Hampshire] No more non-GPL Linux kernel modules?->
Hampshire LUG Mailing List Archive administrated by WebmasterLurker (version 2.3)