Re: [Hampshire] No more non-GPL Linux kernel modules?

I see what you mean. I don't really know what I'm talking about!

On 12/15/06, Jamie Webb <j@???> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 11:22:22AM +0000, John Hunt wrote:
> > Can't we just have two different kernels, a GPL one and a non GPL one?
> > Surely that makes sense.
>
> Which non-GPL one would you like? Darwin? OpenSolaris? WinNT :-)?
>
> Seriously, the whole point of the GPL is that once software is GPLed
> it stays that way. Linux can never be 'un-GPLed'.
>
> /J
>
> --
> Please post to: Hampshire@???
> Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
> LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>