Re: [Hampshire] SCO v. Sanity: The End.

The irony is that SCO's case v. Novell is so gutted that almost the
only part that must go to jury trial is the determination of how much
SCO must pay Novell. The judge could not issue summary judgement on
that aspect, because it was not a matter of law, rather a "disputed
fact".

-jonathan

On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:31:58 +0100
Tony Whitmore <tony@???> wrote:

> hantslug@??? wrote:
> > On Saturday 11 Aug 2007 22:04, Tim wrote:
> >> Does that mean that those companies that Sco scared into buying licences
> >> from them will now be suing Sco as they are not the rightful licences??
> >
> > As I understand it, the Judge has ordered that SCO must pay that money to
> > Novell.
>
> Ah, the irony.
>
> Tony
>