gpg: failed to create temporary file '/var/lib/lurker/.#lk0x57253100.hantslug.org.uk.13197': Permission denied
gpg: keyblock resource '/var/lib/lurker/pubring.gpg': Permission denied
gpg: Signature made Sun Nov 11 18:37:34 2007 GMT
gpg: using DSA key 019AD0D8166C4BF0
gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
On Sunday 11 Nov 2007, Alan Pope wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-11-11 at 11:16 +0000, Adam Trickett wrote:
> > On Sunday 11 Nov 2007, Alan Pope wrote:
> > > Hi Adam,
> > >
> > > On Sun, 2007-11-11 at 10:35 +0000, Adam Trickett wrote:
> > > > Compared with Qemu/kqemu I'd say that both versions of Windows booted
> > > > and ran much faster than Qemu,
> > >
> > > I did some rough benchmarking comparing kvm, qemu/kqemu and Virtual box
> > > a while ago. I found qemu/kqemu was a bit faster than all the others.
> > > This was a few months ago, and things may have moved on since of
> > > course.
> >
> > Things constantly change, which amazes me.
> >
> > The problem I have with qemu/kqemu is that only WinNT4 seems to run in
> > the kqemu mode everything else fails to run with client side BSOD or
> > kernel panics. I'm running qemu under AMD64 not i386 so odd things
> > happen.
>
> That's not true in my experience. I have Windows 95, 98, NT4WS, NT4S,
> Win2K and XP pro running just fine under qemu/kqemu.
I believe you, they just doesn't work well for me! All are happy under plain
qemu, nothing but NT4 seems happy under kqemu...
--
Adam Trickett
Overton, HANTS, UK
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced
-- anon
