gpg: failed to create temporary file '/var/lib/lurker/.#lk0x58147100.hantslug.org.uk.25840': Permission denied
gpg: keyblock resource '/var/lib/lurker/pubring.gpg': Permission denied
gpg: Signature made Sun Nov 11 18:46:03 2007 GMT
gpg: using DSA key 1E38DD6257A4363C
gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
On Sun, 2007-11-11 at 18:37 +0000, Adam Trickett wrote:
> On Sunday 11 Nov 2007, Alan Pope wrote:
> > On Sun, 2007-11-11 at 11:16 +0000, Adam Trickett wrote:
> > > On Sunday 11 Nov 2007, Alan Pope wrote:
> > > > Hi Adam,
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, 2007-11-11 at 10:35 +0000, Adam Trickett wrote:
> > > > > Compared with Qemu/kqemu I'd say that both versions of Windows booted
> > > > > and ran much faster than Qemu,
> > > >
> > > > I did some rough benchmarking comparing kvm, qemu/kqemu and Virtual box
> > > > a while ago. I found qemu/kqemu was a bit faster than all the others.
> > > > This was a few months ago, and things may have moved on since of
> > > > course.
> > >
> > > Things constantly change, which amazes me.
> > >
> > > The problem I have with qemu/kqemu is that only WinNT4 seems to run in
> > > the kqemu mode everything else fails to run with client side BSOD or
> > > kernel panics. I'm running qemu under AMD64 not i386 so odd things
> > > happen.
> >
> > That's not true in my experience. I have Windows 95, 98, NT4WS, NT4S,
> > Win2K and XP pro running just fine under qemu/kqemu.
>
> I believe you, they just doesn't work well for me! All are happy under plain
> qemu, nothing but NT4 seems happy under kqemu...
>
Ok, was just clarifying because in your previous message it sounded like
you were saying that they don't work rather than that they don't work
for you.
Cheers,
Al.
