Re: [Hampshire] LVM device node permissions

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Peter McGowan
Date:  
To: Hampshire LUG Discussion List
Subject: Re: [Hampshire] LVM device node permissions
On Tuesday 13 November 2007 17:22:16 Hugo Mills wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 05:17:55PM -0000, Bond, Peter wrote:
> > >    I've looked at udev, but it doesn't get told about the creation of
> > > device nodes in /dev/mapper (it gets told about /dev/dm-<n>, but
> > > that's useless), so udev is not the solution.

> >
> > Bogged down with arguing with HP hw monitoring at the moment, so maybe
> > I'm not reading things correctly, but what's the issue with using udev to
> > control ownership?
> >
> > http://reactivated.net/writing_udev_rules.html#ownership
>
>    Precisely what I said above -- when the nodes are created, udev is
> not informed, so there's no rules examined. It looks like lvm creates
> the nodes itself, in userspace, rather than going through the kernel
> or otherwise alerting udev.

>
>    Hugo.


Can't you just kick off udevstart? That's what we do on the SAN at work when
we've created new LUNs and need to apply a device persistence udev rule

Peter