Re: [Hampshire] Wireless access point recomendations?

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: James Courtier-Dutton
Date:  
To: Hampshire LUG Discussion List
Subject: Re: [Hampshire] Wireless access point recomendations?
On 05/12/2007, James Courtier-Dutton <james.dutton@???> wrote:
> On 05/12/2007, Paul Tansom <paul@???> wrote:
> > Netgear are ADSL versions of units that have similar DSL equivalents.
> > Again obsolete is the 3Com unit that I started with and have used on
> > customer sites. I've been quite happy with this, bar the fact that the
> > unit I have had a hardware failure - it does have a nice long warranty
> > though, so I'm getting it repaired :) Again this is an ADSL unit, and it
> > is the ADSL side has failed, but the customer sites use pure DSL
> > versions of the same unit (that annoyingly have an extra feature that
> > the ADSL one lacks - static addressing on the DHCP I think it was, but
> > it was a long while ago I configured them!).
> >
>
> What exactly is the "DSL" you talk about.
> DSL to me is just a generic name for "Digital Subsciber Line"
> ADSL is a more specific "Asyncronous Digital Subscriber Line"
> What is "Pure DSL" ?
>
> James
>

and I use Netgear ADSL/Wireless routers and they seem to work fine and
be easy to use.
I suppose that is why Sky use them.