On Wednesday 09 January 2008 18:20:01 Damian Lajos Brasher wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 22:31 +0000, Peter Salisbury wrote:
> > TiddlyWiki is really good - your entire wiki is in a single file so
> > it's easy to take with you on a usb stick etc. Upload to your web
> > site / google and you get a read-only version available from anywhere
> > on line. I keep a link to mine[1] on my iceweasel (firefox) bookmark
> > toolbar so it's always just a click away. Nothing to install other
> > than a javascript css browser.
>
> I think that the fuzzy boundary or overlap between Wiki and CMS (Content
> management systems) makes the decision between choosing one or the other
> quite hard to make depending on your documentation needs.
Have you looked at Alfresco? If you want something to store and
manage documents (as opposed to a wiki, which is really focused on
writing documentation than on storing documents generated elsewhere)
then it is very good.
It does have a plugin for wikis and web content management, though
the wiki isn't that good.
Of course, if you thought DokuWiki had too many pre-requisites,
than Alfresco is probably right out.
--
Be seeing you, http://www.glendale.org.uk
Sam. Mail/IM (Jabber): sam@???
