Re: [Hampshire] Bad GPG signatures

Top Page
Author: Simon Huggins
Date:  
To: hampshire
Subject: Re: [Hampshire] Bad GPG signatures

Reply to this message
gpg: failed to create temporary file '/var/lib/lurker/.#lk0x581bf100.hantslug.org.uk.14245': Permission denied
gpg: keyblock resource '/var/lib/lurker/pubring.gpg': Permission denied
gpg: Signature made Wed Jan 7 10:02:16 2009 GMT
gpg: using DSA key 310765FBDF5CE2B4
gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 08:07:30PM +0000, Hugo Mills wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 08:04:05PM +0000, Chris Smith wrote:
> > Dr Adam Trickett wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 06 Jan 2009, Hugo Mills wrote:
> > >>    Test message.
> > > Looks good.
> > And this one is bad for me.  (Ubuntu Intrepid, gpg 1.4.9)
>    This is good on gpg 1.4.9 (my desktop), but bad on gpg 1.4.6 (my
> server).


>    Adam, Andy -- what versions of gpg are you using?


I have the same results as Chris Smith but with gpg 1.4.6.
It's very odd that different people see the good/bad results inverted.

-- 
Simon Huggins  \ <will-h> the seat on my toilet has more uptime
                \
http://www.earth.li/~huggie/                                htag.pl 0.0.24