Re: [Hampshire] Bad GPG signatures

Top Page
Author: Dr Adam Trickett
Date:  
To: hampshire
Subject: Re: [Hampshire] Bad GPG signatures

Reply to this message
gpg: failed to create temporary file '/var/lib/lurker/.#lk0x56db2100.hantslug.org.uk.14313': Permission denied
gpg: keyblock resource '/var/lib/lurker/pubring.gpg': Permission denied
gpg: Signature made Wed Jan 7 20:38:42 2009 GMT
gpg: using DSA key 019AD0D8166C4BF0
gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
On Wednesday 07 Jan 2009, Simon Huggins wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 08:07:30PM +0000, Hugo Mills wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 08:04:05PM +0000, Chris Smith wrote:
> > > Dr Adam Trickett wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 06 Jan 2009, Hugo Mills wrote:
> > > >>    Test message.

> > > >
> > > > Looks good.
> > >
> > > And this one is bad for me. (Ubuntu Intrepid, gpg 1.4.9)
> >
> >    This is good on gpg 1.4.9 (my desktop), but bad on gpg 1.4.6 (my
> > server).

> >
> >    Adam, Andy -- what versions of gpg are you using?

>
> I have the same results as Chris Smith but with gpg 1.4.6.
> It's very odd that different people see the good/bad results inverted.


Simon's email cam up as "Not enough information" on my system.

--
Adam Trickett
Overton, HANTS, UK

The Politician is an acrobat: he keeps his balance by saying
the opposite of what he does.
    -- Maurice Barres