Re: [Hampshire] [ADMIN] Meeting Instructions

Top Page
Author: Andy Smith
Date:  
To: hampshire
Subject: Re: [Hampshire] [ADMIN] Meeting Instructions

Reply to this message
gpg: failed to create temporary file '/var/lib/lurker/.#lk0x57fea100.hantslug.org.uk.8353': Permission denied
gpg: keyblock resource '/var/lib/lurker/pubring.gpg': Permission denied
gpg: Signature made Fri Apr 10 02:53:39 2009 BST
gpg: using DSA key 2099B64CBF15490B
gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
Hello,

On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 02:17:20AM +0100, Hugo Mills wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 01:05:12AM +0000, Andy Smith wrote:
> > If you ever met someone claiming to be this Adam Trickett, and he
> > could convince you that he really is this Adam Trickett, then you
> > could record that fact by signing his key. His key would then be
> > ultimately trusted.
>
>    Not quite, as I understand it. "Ultimate trust" would be what you
> give to your *own* key(s), and no others (i.e. you, personally, should
> have no doubts about the legitimacy of the keys you control). Keys
> you've checked the validity of and signed are still less trusted than
> "ultimate trust" -- see Andy's comments below.


Yes, sorry, that's completely correct.

Cheers,
Andy