On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 08:29:01 +0100
Philip Stubbs <philip@???> wrote:
> Apparently Adobe are supporting this. So I hope that means a decent
> Flash player becomes available. I know Flash is evil, but it would be
> easier to tolerate the evil if it worked properly. We can even hope
> that Google can convince Adobe to open source it!
I'd be happy if I could even install it, too many website have stuff
that is inaccessible without flash, all I get is
Setting up nspluginwrapper (1.3.0-1) ...
Auto-updating system plugin path. Looking for plugins
in /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/plugins
Setting up ia32-libs-libidn11 (1.10-0.0) ...
Setting up ia32-libs-libssh2 (0.18-0.0) ...
Setting up ia32-libs-libcurl3 (7.18.2-0.0) ...
Setting up ia32-libs-libnspr4 (4.7.1-0.1) ...
Setting up ia32-libs-libnss3 (3.12.0-0.1) ...
Setting up flashplayer-mozilla (2:10.0.22.87-0.2) ...
nspluginwrapper: no appropriate viewer found
for /usr/lib/flashplayer/libflashplayer.so dpkg: error processing
flashplayer-mozilla (--configure): subprocess installed
post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
flashplayer-mozilla
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
A package failed to install. Trying to recover:
--
John Lewis
using Debian Sid with windowmaker for a nicer desktop
