Re: [Hampshire] 32- or 64-bit distro?

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Russell Morris
Date:  
To: Hampshire LUG Discussion List
Subject: Re: [Hampshire] 32- or 64-bit distro?
Last time I had an issue, I think I was missing some lib32 dependencies.
Pretty sure Ubuntu comes with them by default, but I'd removed them.

On 4 May 2010 13:18, Victor Churchill <victorchurchill@???> wrote:

> On 4 May 2010 13:12, Paul Stimpson <paul@???> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I tried 64-bit once about a year ago. I have some 32-bit only apps and
> couldn't work out how to install all the 32-bit libraries needed to make
> them work.
> >
> > Do you know any good guides to doing that please?
>
> Sadly, I've not found any good 'general' guides on this. I have
> struggled with the issue a few times for specific applications, and
> it's normally been a case of googling or searching on the ubuntu
> forums for the particular filename that is being complained about in
> order to find out what compatibility files are required and where to
> put them.
>
> --
> Please post to: Hampshire@???
> Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
> LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>