Re: [Hampshire] 32- or 64-bit distro?

Top Page
Author: Andy Smith
Date:  
To: hampshire
Subject: Re: [Hampshire] 32- or 64-bit distro?

Reply to this message
gpg: failed to create temporary file '/var/lib/lurker/.#lk0x568bc100.hantslug.org.uk.16069': Permission denied
gpg: keyblock resource '/var/lib/lurker/pubring.gpg': Permission denied
gpg: Signature made Tue May 4 18:09:19 2010 BST
gpg: using DSA key 2099B64CBF15490B
gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
Hi Russell,

On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 01:00:48PM +0100, Russell Morris wrote:
> I would personally recommend using AMD64 on any capable system; flash isn't
> an issue these days, and it's very rare to encounter a program that fits if
> you're not on an x64 system.


Are you sure? I don't run any 64-bit desktop/laptop systems myself
(for this reason) but at OggCamp just a few days ago the subject of
Flash came up and many people said they were still having big
problems using it reliably in 64-bit Linux.

Cheers,
Andy

--
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting