Re: [Hampshire] NAS reommendations

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Peter Andrijeczko
Date:  
To: Hampshire LUG Discussion List
Subject: Re: [Hampshire] NAS reommendations
Chris

Yep, there was a cost element to it but it was mainly about trying to reduce
heat output in my study which toasts during the warmer months! :-)

Peter

On 27 June 2011 19:50, Chris. Aubrey-Smith <cas194@???> wrote:

>
>
> On 27 June 2011 18:51, Peter Andrijeczko <peter.andrijeczko@???>wrote:
>
>> Chris
>>
>> I was actually doing that with a Linux PC as a server for years - the main
>> reason I went to NAS drives is that these draw somewhere around 20-30W
>> apiece compared to a PC that was probably averaging around 150-200W with its
>> 500W PSU.
>>
>> --Peter
>>
>> On 24 June 2011 21:52, Chris. Aubrey-Smith <cas194@???> wrote:
>>
>
> Peter,
>
> A valid point, of course, but for an old skinflint like me, near-zero
> up-front cost still weighs heavily against noise and energy consumption.
>
> Perhaps it's time to mend my ways.....
>
> Chris.
>
>
>
> --
> Please post to: Hampshire@???
> Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
> LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>