Re: [Hampshire] Deaf Lug its problems

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Fintan Gaughan
Date:  
To: Hampshire LUG Discussion List
Subject: Re: [Hampshire] Deaf Lug its problems
Can we not start again to resolve this?

I have been responding this email so ok i am wrong. i fail to see the
argument. I hold my hand up . I do apoligise.


So where do i go from here,
What do i need to do next? do i need to send the pgp again in order to
get the log in details? when i mean log in details i meant the
webspace not mailing list.
How long will that take?

regards
Fintan


--

My Blog http://www.finllfixit.co.uk/


On 24/04/07, Andy Smith <andy@???> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 07:38:11PM +0100, Fintan Gaughan wrote:
> > On 24/04/07, Andy Smith <andy@???> wrote:
> > >INTERACTING WITH LUG.ORG.UK ADMINS HOWTO
> > >
> > >VERSION 0.1
> > >
> > >1. Articulate your needs in email to admin@???
> >
> > Which i did do and if your reply to is different then how am i responding
> > to?
> > when my email responded i click on reply.
>
> I fail to parse the above.
>
> > >2. Respond to questions when they are asked.
> >
> > To which i have done!
>
> The rest of us don't seem to be of the same opinion. There is no
> value in dragging out the details here, because it's essentially "he
> said, she said".
>
> > >Specifically DO NOT:
> > >
> > >- fail to answer any question and simply repeatedly ask for login
> > > details
> >
> > Below was writen by phil sent in January
> > "
> > so if you can send over a PGP
> > key for me to send you the login details encrypted that will be great.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Phil"
> >
> > they were the ones i wanted answereing i have sent phil my encripted
> > email hence why i was asking login details
>
> You have conveniently failed to miss out the whole rest of the
> email where he asked you if what he had done was right. Which you
> know as we have been over this already countless times in off-list
> email. So why are you continuing to do it on here?
>
> > >- contact people personally to complain about how slow the process
> > > is, including people completely unrelated to the matter at hand
> >
> > To which i have done
>
> This bit is in the "do not do" part of the HOWTO, btw. I had
> thought that was clear.
>
> > >- leave comments on the personal blogs of various other people
> > > again complaining at how no one is doing anything
> >
> > came across your by accident.
> > they devil in me thinking well if they are not answering there i will
> > write on your blog.
>
> (this also is in the "do not do" section of the HOWTO: those not
> wanting to share Fintan's fate, please don't do this!)
>
> > but it worked you replied but asked an old question which was done
> > in january by phil but your active in your blog but not in Lug.org
> > hell it worked you responded
>
> I guess you consider this totally unnecessary little flamewar
> initiated by you as progress then, OK. But you already know that I
> personally have given up on you and your LUG since you are
> impossible to deal with and it's my spare time. What you are
> getting here is just the responses you provoke by publically
> throwing your toys out of your pram.
>
> Andy
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFGLlWjIJm2TL8VSQsRAgoPAJ49vE7bl6cc/0sr2VU3MTTsEgIh2wCfdCiG
> xeJ2lAfGvryj9ypekXJah1Y=
> =fcMq
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> --
> Please post to: Hampshire@???
> Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
> LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>