Re: [Hampshire] Bad GPG signatures

Top Page
Author: Andy Smith
Date:  
To: hampshire
Subject: Re: [Hampshire] Bad GPG signatures

Reply to this message
gpg: failed to create temporary file '/var/lib/lurker/.#lk0x56b98100.hantslug.org.uk.8854': Permission denied
gpg: keyblock resource '/var/lib/lurker/pubring.gpg': Permission denied
gpg: Signature made Tue Jan 6 18:36:18 2009 GMT
gpg: using DSA key 2099B64CBF15490B
gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
Hi Hugo,

On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 05:21:46PM +0000, Hugo Mills wrote:
>    I've upgraded mutt and gpg on my server to etch-backports, and
> changed the /etc/Muttrc to the packaged version, and my last mail
> checks out OK with a good signature on the desktop box, but fails on
> the server. I think the next job is to strace mutt and find out what
> it's doing when it checks the GPG signatures.


Conversely, the signature on this mail is bad now, for me.

Cheers,
Andy