Re: [Hampshire] Bad GPG signatures

> On Tuesday 06 Jan 2009, Hugo Mills wrote:
>>    I've upgraded mutt and gpg on my server to etch-backports, and
>> changed the /etc/Muttrc to the packaged version, and my last mail
>> checks out OK with a good signature on the desktop box, but fails on
>> the server. I think the next job is to strace mutt and find out what
>> it's doing when it checks the GPG signatures.