Re: [Hampshire] [ADMIN] Wiki

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Tony Whitmore
Date:  
To: Hampshire LUG Discussion List
Subject: Re: [Hampshire] [ADMIN] Wiki

On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 21:39:24 +0100, Hugo Mills <hugo@???> wrote:
>    I would suggest that whoever's in charge of the current
> install/configuration take a look at the original set of patches for
> (Ab)UseMod and work out how to implement those on the new wiki engine.
> (I would expect that at least some of them have direct equivalents
> already implemented).
> 
>    I hope that the change of wiki engine wasn't driven entirely by "it
> looks better than the old one". I rather missed the discussions of the
> changeover.


Although I was aware of the changeover, I rather assumed that all the
equivalent protection and spam prevention methods would be implemented on
the new one. Perhaps that was naive of me. As you say, the AbuseMod patches
weren't perfect they did a reasonably good job of keeping the wiki in
order.

I like the look of the new wiki but if it's going to be spammed to death
then it feels like a backwards step.

Tony