gpg: failed to create temporary file '/var/lib/lurker/.#lk0x57235100.hantslug.org.uk.16644': Permission denied
gpg: keyblock resource '/var/lib/lurker/pubring.gpg': Permission denied
gpg: Signature made Tue Apr 24 19:36:03 2007 BST
gpg: using DSA key 2099B64CBF15490B
gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 07:10:42PM +0100, Fintan Gaughan wrote:
> On 24/04/07, Andy Smith <andy@???> wrote:
> >On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 03:45:05PM +0100, Fintan Gaughan wrote:
> >> Oh no it won't be bitching , just more of how it can get wires crossed .
> >
> >The only crossed wires were in your head. You never responded to
> >the crucial question of, essentially, "is this right?" which has
> >been asked to you a number of times over the last few months by a
> >number of different people, including some of the people you drafted
> >in from outside for whatever reason.
>
> Which to i have replied to .. yes to phil
You did not confirm until yesterday. We have already had this
conversation at length. Why you bother to have it again in public
just so you can continue to state the opposite is beyond me.
> if you check it has been changed in January .. which has been set up
> Your the third person to ask me this YES YES
4th person, and that's because you never did respond. That was the
blocking issue as is clear to everyone involved except you.
> >Which you never bothered to confirm; a normal person when confronted
> >by a question like "is this right?" when they are under the
> >impression that it is, would perhaps say "yes, I thought I said so
> >earlier", not completely ignore it and go off asking other people
> >why nothing is happening.
>
> yes I AM HAPPY WITH THE SET UP which has been done in January. go and ask
> Phil
We know; you said so yesterday. Eventually, and for the first time.
Why are we having this conversation? Why are we having it on
Hampshire LUG's mailing list?
> >> My feeling that the person I orginaly replied to can be away or busy
> >> when I ask the question again ( on serperatle email as it not got
> >> answered) another person email me with a question which has been
> >> answered to by a different person.
> >
> >You have always been told to only talk to admin@???. Every
> >mail you have been sent regarding the setup of your services had
> >reply-to set.
>
> I only reply to emails that sent to me.
> When phil sent me email which he was the first one to send email about
> set up quite naturaly i click on reply and said yes
What you did was reply, ignore the questions asked you and ask for
login details. Then you repeated this 4 or 5 more times over the
course of months. But you know this, so I don't understand why you
feel going through this again in public is going to make any
difference. Whose mind is going to be changed?
> I am not bitching about it as i have answered to your questions to
> which it has been settled.
It sure seems like bitching to me! What are you hoping to achieve?
> I posted on here as most people answer or point me to right directions
> to which they have done in the past.
Many of the people who would answer you here, are the SAME people
who answer you when you mail admin@???! Also, those that
aren't are completely unable to do anything for you!
So tell me again why this conversation about past events is
happening here and how it is not "bitching" and how there is any
point to it?
> besides they tend to get answered quickly. yeah give a day or 2 but
> not few months.
Every one of your emails was answered promptly. Even the ones you
got other people to send on your behalf were answered promptly.
Andy
