Re: [Hampshire] Spamassassin shortcircuiting

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Duncan B.
Date:  
To: lug, Hampshire LUG Discussion List
CC: 
Subject: Re: [Hampshire] Spamassassin shortcircuiting
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007, Vic wrote:

>> would one usually use mimedefang with MailScanner, or as an
>> alternative?
>
> I wouldn't run MailScanner[1] with anything...


Hi Vic,

I understand what you're saying about using Milters instead.
However, do these offer the same level of usability? For example, being
able to ues 'MailWatch' with mailscanner is very handy for tracking what
goes through the box, plus the high level of configurability that MS
offers.

I understand that any perl based app. probably wont be as fast anyhow :)

Cheers

Duncan