Re: [Hampshire] Yet Another Virtualisation Question

Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
Mthe complete thread tree sorted by date
MAdam Trickett at <-
MSteve Kemp at ->

Reply to this message
Author: Steve Kemp
Date:  
To: adam.trickett, Hampshire LUG Discussion List
CC: 
Subject: Re: [Hampshire] Yet Another Virtualisation Question
On Thu Feb 28, 2008 at 20:23:16 +0000, Adam Trickett wrote:

> My ByteMark server is UML and works quite well. As good as UML is I don't
> think it's a technology of the future - but then again I may be wrong...

UML suffers when you're doing heavy disk I/O, but otherwise is stable
well supported and useful.

Steve
--
# Commercial Debian GNU/Linux Support
http://www.linux-administration.org/



This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
Hampshire LUG
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-Re: [Hampshire] Yet Another Virtualisation QuestionRe: [Hampshire] Yet Another Virtualisation Question->
Hampshire LUG Mailing List Archive administrated by WebmasterLurker (version 2.3)