Re: [Hampshire] Wireless access point recomendations?

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: James Ashburner
Date:  
To: Hampshire LUG Discussion List
Subject: Re: [Hampshire] Wireless access point recomendations?
James Ashburner wrote:
> James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
>> On 05/12/2007, Paul Tansom <paul@???> wrote:
>>> Netgear are ADSL versions of units that have similar DSL equivalents.
>>> Again obsolete is the 3Com unit that I started with and have used on
>>> customer sites. I've been quite happy with this, bar the fact that the
>>> unit I have had a hardware failure - it does have a nice long warranty
>>> though, so I'm getting it repaired :) Again this is an ADSL unit, and it
>>> is the ADSL side has failed, but the customer sites use pure DSL
>>> versions of the same unit (that annoyingly have an extra feature that
>>> the ADSL one lacks - static addressing on the DHCP I think it was, but
>>> it was a long while ago I configured them!).
>>>
>>
>> What exactly is the "DSL" you talk about.
>> DSL to me is just a generic name for "Digital Subsciber Line"
>> ADSL is a more specific "Asyncronous Digital Subscriber Line"
>> What is "Pure DSL" ?
>>
>> James
>>
>
> Damn Small Linux: http://damnsmalllinux.org/
>
> James
>


*Ahem* Sorry, wrong thread... in my defence I'm currently off work with
whiplash so concentrating's not as easy as usual :)

James