[Hampshire] No more non-GPL Linux kernel modules?

Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
M--+-++\the complete thread tree sorted by date
M-\M\MMMM 
M\MMMM.MBond, Peter at ->
Author: Andy Smith
Date:  
To: Hampshire LUG Discussion List
Subject: [Hampshire] No more non-GPL Linux kernel modules?

Reply to this message
gpg: failed to create temporary file '/var/lib/lurker/.#lk0x579aa100.hantslug.org.uk.31763': Permission denied
gpg: keyblock resource '/var/lib/lurker/pubring.gpg': Permission denied
gpg: Signature made Thu Dec 14 11:08:07 2006 GMT
gpg: using DSA key 2099B64CBF15490B
gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
So,

No more non-GPL Linux kernel modules 12 months from now:

http://www.kroah.com/log/2006/12/13#2006_12_13

But Linus doesn't think it's the right thing to do:

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/475824

What do you think?

--
http://strugglers.net/wiki/Xen_hosting -- A Xen VPS hosting hobby
Encrypted mail welcome - keyid 0x604DE5DB
This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
Hampshire LUG
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-Re: [Hampshire] using yum through a firewall/proxy?[Hampshire] RE: [OT] A hot new PC without Windoze?->
Hampshire LUG Mailing List Archive administrated by WebmasterLurker (version 2.3)