* Damian Brasher (lug@???) wrote:
> > The list as we know it is the result of what emerged from an attempt to
> > censor both content and subscribers. It was decided at that time that it
> > would be neither censored nor split to accommodate individual ideas of
> > the shape it should take. If you wish to alter that I would suggest that
> > you campaign for it between now and the next AGM, when we can all take a
> > vote on any proposed changes.
> >
>
> This feels badly thought out and asking for trouble - I was not around to
> comment and have explained why. I will listen to what you have said and
> aim for the next AGM. The fact that the list has been highly unmoderated
> by design is a bit of a shock! This explains a lot and also explains why I
> feel disappointed with the list moderators, Ian and Alan, who seem to be
> doing nothing which has led me to distrust them. Why why why did the
> committee think it a reasonable decision to have so little pro-active
> moderation????
>
> Dumbfounded!
May I suggest that if you find this list so shocking, un-subscribe!
No one is forcing you to be here.
--
Philip Stubbs
http://www.stuphi.co.uk
