Re: [Hampshire] Server side anti-spam

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Adrian Bridgett
Date:  
To: Hampshire LUG Discussion List
Subject: Re: [Hampshire] Server side anti-spam
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 15:52:55 +0000 (+0000), Paul Tansom wrote:
> I'm in the process of putting together a new server side anti-spam
> setup, and I was planning to go for dspam to allow me to have a web


I was going to look at DSPAM, or possibly CRM114.

> Alternatively what do other people use. I'm based on Exim and have been
> using Spammassasin via Procmail. I rebuilt my server a while back and


postfix, spamassassin, amavis, clamav, maildrop (which kicks procmail
where it hurts). I'm had problems with clamav - updates which require
newer engine version so it just stops working (and amavis then starts
blocking).

> My plan b for the time being may be to use Spamassassin combined with
> Greylisting. I'm not a big fan of Greylisting since I don't really want


I use greylisting and it is a pain. Particularly when (large)
providers try sending from IP-address A, then IP-address B, ... (time
passes) then IP-address A again (now accepted!)

I've been quite suprised - I would have thought that with the
popularity of greylisting they would:
a) drop the repeat time down
b) not do round-robin sending like that

> Mailscanner looks good, but I'm not to happy about the way it has to be
> setup with Exim, and I'm not exactly excited about the idea of migrating
> to Postfix.


I used to use exim with mailscanner and was pretty happy with it.
IIRC I had to be careful with the exim crontab (and duplicate bits to
remove old files). I'm not a big amavis fan - it seems quite poorly
documented IMO.

Adrian
--
Email: adrian@??? -*- GPG key available on public key servers
Debian GNU/Linux - the maintainable distribution -*- www.debian.org